Monday, November 8, 2010

Stronger Dollar Sends Stocks Falling


LPL Financial's IPO is the story of the American Retirement Dream Fulfilled. This IPO is not unlike the IPO of Apple or Microsoft for their respective industry. Todd Robinson, Mark Casady, Jim Putnam and countless others followed the desires of the American investing public for independent advice, fee for service, non-proprietary products and superior technology.



Together they have reinvented the American financial planning service model to the benefit of all American investors. LPL attracted the nation's finest advisors--men like Ron Carson--and countless others, and built a firm equaling Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, UBS PaineWebber and others in only two decades.



LPL now embodies the American Retirement Dream and is the antidote for the American Retirement Crisis.



Read my blog for more insight.http://www­.wealthves­t.com/blog­/wade-dok ... ommentary/



Wade Dokken



President



WealthVest Marketing
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Feeling Sanguine about Stocks

Feeling sanguine about stocks? Here is a data point that should give you pause. Via the AAII and James Mackintosh at the FT, holdings of cash are now at their lowest levels since March of 2000.

“If that date sounds familiar,” adds Mackintosh, “it should. The dot com bubble was just about to pop, and the S&P 500 hit levels not reached again for seven years.”

Mackintosh further highlights the “bull-bear spread” (blue line) as plotted against the S&P 500 (red line) in the multi-year chart above (click to enlarge).

 

The bull-bear spread is a basic contrary indicator that is most valuable at extremes. When bulls greatly outnumber bears — as represented by spikes in the spread — the market tends to run out of gas.

This makes sense because, when optimism peaks, those with an urge to buy have mostly done so. Conversely, the bull-bear spread did a great job of highlighting the March 2009 lows, which came at a pessimistic extreme.

As you can see, at current levels, the bull-bear spread is at record highs (with cash holdings at decade lows). Complacency is rampant. So why haven’t stocks roared even more? Because a good portion of that bullishness has been focused on corporate credit markets alongside equities.

Bulls argue that the S&P is still reasonably priced, based on a forward earnings multiple in the 12.5 range. But this assumption depends on a far more speculative one — that corporate earnings have not hit a cyclical peak. The twin threats of post-stimulus slowdown and housing double dip threaten this belief.

What really matters now is whether the U.S. economy is in true recovery or not. If the answer is “yes,” then the Fed is behind the curve and QE2 will serve as just another inflationary paper asset boost. If the answer is “no,” then the great body of evidence suggests QE2 will fail — and investors will be punished harshly for taking their complacency to such extremes.

Disclosure: As active traders, authors may have positions long or short in any securities mentioned. Full disclaimer can be found here.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Beyond referrals

Jack Keeter is a terrific advisor, highly recognized in the industry, and recipient of multiple industry awards.  Jack's commitment to his clients is second to none and this is the secret of his success--complete and total attention to the people who have given him their trust.   This is when referrals work--and work well.  This is a timely read.  Wade Dokken

 

Referrals. They’re the lifeblood of many a financial services practice. Without them, books of business fail to grow, practices stagnate, incomes fall and careers fade. But even with referrals advisors can find themselves working too hard, chasing a numbers game that rewards too few and punishes too many.

“We used to do the numbers game, and we got business,” says Todd Wooten, president of Wooten Financial Services in Valparaiso, Ind. (www.wootenfinancial.com). “But we didn’t get long-term business. There was no loyalty factor.”

The difference between cold leads and warm leads is obvious to any advisor, but what about the difference between a referral and a personal introduction?

Referrals come in a couple of different manifestations. One type is where the advisor never even knows it was made: “Hey, this guy took care of my financial plan. You should call him; here’s his card.” The other leaves the advisor stuck making calls and name-dropping — “Hey, Mr. Advisor, here is a list of names and numbers of friends of mine you might be able to help” — which can work to a satisfying degree in many cases but leaves something to be desired.
Personal introductions from other professionals — whether in the financial services arena or peripheral to it — trump either form of referral. They carry an implicit endorsement of the advisor and, by taking place in the other professional’s office, can put all parties at ease.

 

Many advisors already have these kinds of relationships in place, having cultivated them for years. While the list of potential allies can be long, there are a few professionals that come up repeatedly. The big five are detailed below. These are folks whose help can take an advisor’s practice to the next level, provided the advisor is willing to do the same in return — actually, provided the advisor is willing to give something first. When seeking out these all-important alliances, remember one thing — maybe the one thing that costs some advisors the relationships they seek: “Give value before asking for it,” says Jack Keeter, president of Jack Keeter and Associates (www.jackkeeter.com) in Anaheim, Calif. “They’re going to want to know, ‘What’s in it for me?’ Convince them of the value you bring.”

Attorney
If this list were to be broken out by more specific individual titles, attorneys might occupy half of the top 10, that’s how often they are mentioned by advisors. Senior advisors likely are most interested in lawyers who specialize in elder law and estate planning — they have clients in the right age group and with the right needs. Keeter says estate planning attorneys are nice to form alliances with because they “deal with people at transitional times in their lives.” Estate planning attorneys are there when there is a death in the family; when someone is readying for retirement; or when someone receives an inheritance — all situations that make people take a second look at their entire financial picture.

Wooten says attorneys are a solid addition to any advisor’s team because — like it or not — they are higher up the admiration-ladder than advisors.

“People respect attorneys before planners,” Wooten says, especially in light of all the recent negative coverage of the financial services industry generally and annuities specifically.
   
CPA
Advisors love getting introductions from accountants. CPAs have access to all of the information an advisor needs to help clients and they have their clients’ trust, especially if they are as adamant about doing what’s right for the client as good advisors are. Nathan O’Bryant, president of O’Bryant and Associates (www.obryantandassociates.com) in Huntingdon, Tenn., works with a CPA, and he wishes he could work with many more. It’s not for lack of trying.

“In such a rural area, there’s only one CPA in town,” O’Bryant says.
Why does he like CPAs so much?

“They’re looking at everyone’s tax return,” O’Bryant says. “They can see people’s tax burden and introduce them to professionals who can reduce it.”
   
LTCI specialist
Long term care insurance takes too much time and effort. So goes the thinking for many financial advisors, but the product is important to most plans, so it cannot be pushed aside. Planners who don’t want to deal with the LTCI side of things would be wise to forge an alliance with an LTCI specialist — and there are plenty out there. Entire networks of LTCI-only advisors have sprung up in the last decade or so. Some are sponsored by marketing organizations and some have grown organically, but the common thread is that these are people who don’t want to steal an advisor’s planning opportunities or annuity business. They specialize in LTCI.

“There are a lot of reasons to discuss LTCI with clients, even if you don’t want to deal with it,” says Stephen Drain, senior vice president, marketing for Personalized Brokerage Services in Topeka, Kansas. “For a lot of advisors, LTCI is a messy thing. It’s a dramatic conversation that requires a lot of
patience. Some people might not have that.”
   
Personal lines agent
Other insurance agents are good people for senior advisors to know, especially those who specialize in the personal lines of insurance like auto and homeowners’ insurance, Wooten says. They usually have huge books of business — hundreds of clients — but they don’t deal with finances much.

“Personal lines agents represent a tremendous opportunity for advisors,” Wooten says. “They’ll have anywhere from 500 to 3,000 customers, but they don’t want to talk about financial planning [with their clients]. It’s a huge opportunity.”

Advisors will have to spend some time with the agent, teaching him how to recognize the advisor’s ideal client profile. Random, widespread introductions have the potential to bog an advisor down if most of the potential clients are the wrong fit.

Securities-licensed broker
Advisors who choose to eschew securities licenses and stay with their life and health licenses only will need to become friends with a securities licensed financial professional, Drain says, especially from a suitability standpoint.

“It boils down to doing the right thing for the client,” Drain says. And having the capability to talk about securities and insurance products goes a long, long way to doing the right thing.

Drain says many senior advisors get their securities licenses and park them with a broker-dealer so they can talk about variable products and securities even if they never plan to sell them. That way, he says, “They can have a conversation about risk assessment legally, and talk about moving money from variable to fixed products.”
Advisors who want to concentrate on insurance and annuities need to find a friendly securities broker who understands the importance of fixed products in an overall financial plan but doesn’t necessarily want to sell them.

Financial professionals who are still playing the numbers game should stop, unless the prospect of hundreds upon hundreds of short-term relationships sounds appealing. Long-lasting, fruitful relationships come from developing trust and friendship, and receiving personal introductions from other trusted professionals goes a long way to establishing the advisor as the planner. Find experts in other fields who share the same values and service philosophies and help each other be the best.

Referrals. They’re the lifeblood of many a financial services practice. Without them, books of business fail to grow, practices stagnate, incomes fall and careers fade. But even with referrals advisors can find themselves working too hard, chasing a numbers game that rewards too few and punishes too many.

“We used to do the numbers game, and we got business,” says Todd Wooten, president of Wooten Financial Services in Valparaiso, Ind. (www.wootenfinancial.com). “But we didn’t get long-term business. There was no loyalty factor.”

The difference between cold leads and warm leads is obvious to any advisor, but what about the difference between a referral and a personal introduction?

Referrals come in a couple of different manifestations. One type is where the advisor never even knows it was made: “Hey, this guy took care of my financial plan. You should call him; here’s his card.” The other leaves the advisor stuck making calls and name-dropping — “Hey, Mr. Advisor, here is a list of names and numbers of friends of mine you might be able to help” — which can work to a satisfying degree in many cases but leaves something to be desired.
Personal introductions from other professionals — whether in the financial services arena or peripheral to it — trump either form of referral. They carry an implicit endorsement of the advisor and, by taking place in the other professional’s office, can put all parties at ease.

Many advisors already have these kinds of relationships in place, having cultivated them for years. While the list of potential allies can be long, there are a few professionals that come up repeatedly. The big five are detailed below. These are folks whose help can take an advisor’s practice to the next level, provided the advisor is willing to do the same in return — actually, provided the advisor is willing to give something first. When seeking out these all-important alliances, remember one thing — maybe the one thing that costs some advisors the relationships they seek: “Give value before asking for it,” says Jack Keeter, president of Jack Keeter and Associates (www.jackkeeter.com) in Anaheim, Calif. “They’re going to want to know, ‘What’s in it for me?’ Convince them of the value you bring.”

Attorney
If this list were to be broken out by more specific individual titles, attorneys might occupy half of the top 10, that’s how often they are mentioned by advisors. Senior advisors likely are most interested in lawyers who specialize in elder law and estate planning — they have clients in the right age group and with the right needs. Keeter says estate planning attorneys are nice to form alliances with because they “deal with people at transitional times in their lives.” Estate planning attorneys are there when there is a death in the family; when someone is readying for retirement; or when someone receives an inheritance — all situations that make people take a second look at their entire financial picture.

Wooten says attorneys are a solid addition to any advisor’s team because — like it or not — they are higher up the admiration-ladder than advisors.

“People respect attorneys before planners,” Wooten says, especially in light of all the recent negative coverage of the financial services industry generally and annuities specifically.
   
CPA
Advisors love getting introductions from accountants. CPAs have access to all of the information an advisor needs to help clients and they have their clients’ trust, especially if they are as adamant about doing what’s right for the client as good advisors are. Nathan O’Bryant, president of O’Bryant and Associates (www.obryantandassociates.com) in Huntingdon, Tenn., works with a CPA, and he wishes he could work with many more. It’s not for lack of trying.

“In such a rural area, there’s only one CPA in town,” O’Bryant says.
Why does he like CPAs so much?

“They’re looking at everyone’s tax return,” O’Bryant says. “They can see people’s tax burden and introduce them to professionals who can reduce it.”
   
LTCI specialist
Long term care insurance takes too much time and effort. So goes the thinking for many financial advisors, but the product is important to most plans, so it cannot be pushed aside. Planners who don’t want to deal with the LTCI side of things would be wise to forge an alliance with an LTCI specialist — and there are plenty out there. Entire networks of LTCI-only advisors have sprung up in the last decade or so. Some are sponsored by marketing organizations and some have grown organically, but the common thread is that these are people who don’t want to steal an advisor’s planning opportunities or annuity business. They specialize in LTCI.

“There are a lot of reasons to discuss LTCI with clients, even if you don’t want to deal with it,” says Stephen Drain, senior vice president, marketing for Personalized Brokerage Services in Topeka, Kansas. “For a lot of advisors, LTCI is a messy thing. It’s a dramatic conversation that requires a lot of
patience. Some people might not have that.”
   
Personal lines agent
Other insurance agents are good people for senior advisors to know, especially those who specialize in the personal lines of insurance like auto and homeowners’ insurance, Wooten says. They usually have huge books of business — hundreds of clients — but they don’t deal with finances much.

“Personal lines agents represent a tremendous opportunity for advisors,” Wooten says. “They’ll have anywhere from 500 to 3,000 customers, but they don’t want to talk about financial planning [with their clients]. It’s a huge opportunity.”

Advisors will have to spend some time with the agent, teaching him how to recognize the advisor’s ideal client profile. Random, widespread introductions have the potential to bog an advisor down if most of the potential clients are the wrong fit.

Securities-licensed broker
Advisors who choose to eschew securities licenses and stay with their life and health licenses only will need to become friends with a securities licensed financial professional, Drain says, especially from a suitability standpoint.

“It boils down to doing the right thing for the client,” Drain says. And having the capability to talk about securities and insurance products goes a long, long way to doing the right thing.

Drain says many senior advisors get their securities licenses and park them with a broker-dealer so they can talk about variable products and securities even if they never plan to sell them. That way, he says, “They can have a conversation about risk assessment legally, and talk about moving money from variable to fixed products.”
Advisors who want to concentrate on insurance and annuities need to find a friendly securities broker who understands the importance of fixed products in an overall financial plan but doesn’t necessarily want to sell them.

Financial professionals who are still playing the numbers game should stop, unless the prospect of hundreds upon hundreds of short-term relationships sounds appealing. Long-lasting, fruitful relationships come from developing trust and friendship, and receiving personal introductions from other trusted professionals goes a long way to establishing the advisor as the planner. Find experts in other fields who share the same values and service philosophies and help each other be the best.

 

Comparing Lifetime Income Options | Financial News


Longevity risk is the greatest fear of most retirees. You can now buy insurance to protect you from longevity risk: the risk of outliving you money. Just like you insure your home, car, health, etc. from the expenses of loss, insurance companies now offer annuities to protect you in retirement. What's more, it is the best kind of insurance because even if you lose (die early) your spouse and beneficiaries can remain protected. Like all insurance, you need to shop for the policy that best suits your needs and circumstances. Unlike health and life insurance, longevity insurance is not based on your health because you're insuring against living too long rather than dying too soon.

 

The coverage you get to protect your retirement years looks more like an investment than insurance. You simply deposit with an insurance company part or all of your retirement money and they in turn guarantee you an annual income for life, or joint life if you want to protect your spouse. The amount of the guaranteed annual income is based on the amount of money you deposit with them and whether or not you want single or joint coverage. Let see how this works.

 

Lets assume you're age 55 and have started to think about retirement when you reach 65. You've been saving money during your working years and let's assume you have 0,000 accumulated for retirement (this could be in a 401(k), 403(b) or in an account that does not qualify as a pension such as stocks, bonds, bank CD, annuities, real estate, etc.). Let's say you want to make sure you'll have at least ,000 per year when you retire in ten years and this amount will be guaranteed for your lifetime. How could you arrange this lifetime guaranteed income now that will be ready for you in ten years? First, we need to see how much you'll be getting from other sources. Let's make this easy by assuming your only other source of income will be Social Security.

 

By going to the Social Security Administration's web site (www.ssa.gov) and making some assumptions, you can estimate your Social Security benefits. Let say you do that and find that your Social Security benefits will be ,803 in ten years when you plan to retire. The task at hand is to determine how much you'll need to give the insurance company today to buy an annuity that will guarantee you the remaining ,197 when you retire in ten years. You'll want to shop the market for the best buy and this is usually accomplished by engaging the services of your financial advisor. Let's say you find a fixed index-linked annuity that guarantees that your money will grow by at least 7% annually if you later turn it into an income (yes, there are annuities from top-quality insurance companies that will do this). Also assume the insurance company rewards you with a bonus of 10% of the amount that you deposit with them - that is, if you give them 0,000, they'll credit you with 0,000 if you later take a lifetime income. Yes, such bonuses are available if you shop.

 

At age 65 the annuity you chose will guarantee you a lifetime annual income equal to 5.5% of the amount in your account when you "lock in" the income at age 65. How much of your 0,000 will it take to get the guaranteed lifetime income of ,197 you need to supplement Social Security so you will always have at least ,000 for the remainder of your life? Since you'll need ,197 in ten years, and we know that will be 5.5% of your annuity's account value, we can determine the account value by dividing 24,197 by 5.5%. This amount is 9,945. But, you'll not need this for another ten years, so we have to determine how much you'll need to give the insurance company now. This is where the math gets complicated and why you'll need help. If you invested 3,314 with the insurance company today and they credited you with a 10% bonus and guaranteed that your account would grow by at least 7% annually over the next ten years, you'd have the needed 9,945 when you retire ten years hence.

 

You have successfully insured your longevity risk by buying an insurance policy. But, what happens if you don't get to age 65 or you die sooner than the insurance company estimated you would?

 

There's good news and bad news! The bad news is that your worries about money will be over. The good news is that your spouse can continue the income for the remainder of his/her life if you chose the joint life option. If you are not married or did not choose the spousal option, your beneficiary will get the remainder of your account value. The remaining account value will be based on how much income you have taken, if any, plus the earnings credited to your annuity. The earnings are credited based on the market index to which it is linked BUT you never participate in market losses; however, you will participate in market gains as measured by the market index. Additionally, you'll be guaranteed some minimum rate of return by the insurance company even if the market loses every year you've got your money in the annuity. In other words you can't lose but you could do really well.

 

So, you've covered your longevity risk: you simply cannot outlive your guaranteed income because your insurance company must pay you until you die and Social Security is obligated to pay for the remainder of your life. Also, you will not lose your annuity money if you die too soon because your spouse, or beneficiaries, will get the remainder at your death. The best of both world! What's more, you can start, stop and store the income if your circumstances change (you might win the lottery or get an inheritance) AND you'll not pay income taxes on the earnings inside your annuity until you actually start withdrawing it ten years from now. What happens if you need the income in five years? You can start it after one year as long as you're age 59½ or better, but the amount will be lower than if you wait the full ten years. Do you have to start at the end of year ten? No, because you're in control. You could decide to take all you money in a lump sum and reinvest it elsewhere (make sure your annuity is not a payout two-tier that requires you to take installment payments over five or ten years if you don't want a lifetime income - see the article on two-tiers in this retirement blog). You've covered your longevity risk without giving up control of your money.

 

Why have insurance companies started offering these types of annuities? It's all because of the baby boomers. As you know there were 78 million folks born between 1946 and 1964. The demographic bulge started turning 62 in 2008 and one boomer will turn 62 every 7.5 seconds for the next 18 years. And guess what is utmost on their mind? Correct, outliving their money because they do not have a lifetime pension like their parents and grandparents did. They are turning to the insurance industry to guarantee that they'll have a lifetime income if they live too long and have demanded that they not give away their money if they die too soon. The insurance industry has responded.

 

Are these policies fair to the policyholders? Like all insurance policies, they offer protection against loss and in this case those who die too soon don't get nearly as good a deal as those who live too long. But, since your number one fear is outliving your money and you'll not be disappointed at leaving money on the table once you've transcended to a place where money is not important, you've covered your risk at a fair price. Insurance companies are doing what they do best: pooling risk across a large group and guaranteeing that they'll pay if the worse happens. In this case, the worst is living too long for the money you've set aside for retirement. If you're worried about longevity risk, call your financial advisor today and talk to him/her about this new type of insurance. When selecting an annuity with a guaranteed lifetime income benefit, always consider the following:

Compare carefully how much money is needed by doing exercises similar to the above. Get help from your financial advisor!
Compare the cost of the rider: they range from 0% to 0.4% annually.
How often do income factors change? Annually, every 5 years, every 10 years, etc.
Spousal continuation provisions and also is there inflation protection.
What income "step-up" features are offered? At step-up does the income factor, related to age, also increase?
How long can you lock-in the guaranteed growth of the income account?
What is the rating of the insurance company?

------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Shelby Smith has an earned Doctorate in Economics from Iowa State University of Science and Technology along with a Bachelor’s and Masters degree in Economics from the University of Wyoming. He started his professional career as a college professor and held professorships at several Midwestern and Southern universities. He entered the corporate arena as the Chief Economist of a Regional Federal Home Loan Bank, moved then into the banking business where he served as Economists, Chief Financial Officer, President & CEO, and Chairman of several institutions. He started a financial marketing company that catered to financial institutions and their clients by providing investment products. For the past twenty years Dr. Smith has been providing consultation and services to conservative investors and savers positioning their assets for retirement. In the process Dr. Smith has managed a broker dealer and held licenses that allowed him to offer securities and insurance products to the general public.

 

Life Insurers Slip to Second Quarter Loss on Stock Market Slump - Bloomberg comments Wade Dokken

U.S. life insurers, a group led by MetLife Inc. and Prudential Financial Inc., slipped to a loss in the second quarter as the stock-market retreat prompted sellers of equity-linked retirement products to boost reserves.

The industry recorded a net loss of $900.3 million, compared with net income of $8.9 billion in the same period a year earlier, research firm SNL Financial said today in an e- mailed statement.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index dropped 12 percent in the three months ended June 30, its first decline in five quarters. Insurers that sell variable annuities often promise to shoulder a portion of investment losses for clients. When stocks fall, carriers add to funds backing these guarantees.

“Reserve strengthening significantly affected performance in the second quarter, especially at many of the largest annuity writers,” Jon Wright, SNL’s director of insurance, said in the statement.

SNL’s study was based on so-called statutory insurance data. Statutory accounting is used by state regulators to monitor insurer solvency and differs from the standards required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, using generally accepted accounting principles.

Prudential and New York-based MetLife are the top two sellers of variable annuities in the U.S., according to trade group Limra International. Both companies reported second- quarter profits, under GAAP rules.

Prudential, based in Newark, New Jersey, lost 11 percent in the second quarter and MetLife fell 12 percent in New York Stock Exchange composite training.

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Dan Kraut at dkraut2@bloomberg.net

This details the complexity of managing variable annuity portfolios for the insurance company--and should remind investors of the real value of index annuity writers, fixed annuity writers and variable annuity writers. These products absorb investment risk from policy-holders and greatly aid Americans seeking shelter from the retirement crisis through annuity private pensions. Wade Dokken

Annuities Could Get Boost From Small Business Legislation - Financial Planning edited Wade Dokken

Annuities Could Get Boost From Small Business Legislation

This is a terrific change in government policy tenor.  During the 1980's and early 1990's annuities were castigated for their "tax deferred build-up" and the perception that this represented lost tax revenue.  Now annuities are recognized for their ability to provide guaranteed lifetime income and guarantees of principal.   Bravo.  Wade Dokken

 

September 28, 2010

The battered annuity industry seemed to have found a powerful ally in President Obama’s administration, when the Middle Class Task Force issued a report in January saying the executive branch would work to promote the availability of annuities and other forms of guaranteed income.

Part of that promise was fulfilled Monday, after President Obama signed the Small Business Jobs Act into law. The legislation includes a provision that allows holders of non-qualified annuities to carve out some of the funds from a deferred annuity and buy an immediate annuity contract with those proceeds. The original deferred annuity will continue to grow and accumulate tax-deferred income. Designated as an offset, it is designed to promote retirement preparedness.

The Small Business Jobs Act might open more doors for the annuity industry, specifically making independent advisors and their clients more comfortable with variable annuities, which are rebounding off of a period of unpopularity. Overall, annuity sales have been up and down recently. In its second-quarter roundup of annuity sales, LIMRA estimated that annuity sales overall were down 16% year over year. Of that number, however, variable annuity sales were up 8%, underscoring the fact that more independent financial advisors are becoming comfortable with the products.

More to the point, annuities are claiming a bigger slice of overall revenues at independent broker-dealers. Annuities accounted for $3.7 billion, or 26.2%, of total revenues for 2009. Variable annuities were responsible for $3.1 billion, or 85%, of that total, and variable annuities accounted for 22.3% of overall product revenues. For their part, fixed annuities accounted for $495.3 million, or 13.5%, of total annuity revenues.

Because of their size, some small business owners are not able to directly offer qualified retirement savings plans. For employees of these companies who happen to own a deferred annuity contract, the new law gives them greater flexibility to save outside of the workplace toward a secure retirement, according to Cathy Weatherford, president and chief executive officer of the Insured Retirement Institute, based in Washington, D.C.

Currently, if an individual wants to pull a portion of money out of his or her single guaranteed annuity and buy a separate contract, that investor would have to cancel the original contract and buy two separate annuities. They would incur a surrender charge beginning at 5% of the invested amount, at least, and ranging to 7% and up, Weatherford said.

“This is a giant step forward that will allow Americans to have annuities … as they build out their retirement savings strategies going forward,” Weatherford said. “It will save money on fees for exchanges or those types of things. It is a way for people to get one more option to continue to grow next egg at time when might need guaranteed lifetime income.”

There could be more to come from the current administration, in terms of supporting the annuity industry. In February, the Department of Labor and the Treasury Department requested information for how to encourage 401(k) plans to offer annuities to their participants, which has gotten many responses from insurance companies and trade groups.

 

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Annuity Shopping Becomes Easier for Vanguard Customers

Review - Your Money - Bucks Blog - NYTimes.com

Millions of baby boomers nearing retirement are starting to think about how much income they’ll need to cover monthly expenses once they stop working for good.

Social Security, personal savings and, if you’re lucky, a pension will all play a role. But some retirees may also decide to convert a portion of their savings into a basic fixed annuity, also called a single premium immediate annuity: you essentially hand over a pile of cash to an insurance company, and it pays you a guaranteed stream of income for life.

Vanguard is trying to make shopping for these annuities a bit easier. This month, it introduced an online marketplace called Vanguard Annuity Access, which allows Vanguard customers to compare the costs of annuity contracts from different providers. Price quotes are provided in real time, but what really sets Vanguard’s service apart from its competitors is that it discloses its commissions upfront, something providers aren’t required to do. (Did you read that, Elizabeth Warren?)

Vanguard charges a flat commission of 2 percent of the amount invested, and it shares the payment with Hueler Investment Services, which is essentially the engine behind the new service. The insurance companies that provide the annuities have their own expenses, and, like other annuities, those expenses are factored into the amount of income you receive.

But one competitor said it believed that the disclosure of commissions was simply a marketing gimmick: Since immediate-annuity quotes tell investors the monthly payment they stand to collect each month — with commissions and expenses already subtracted — they argue that investors can already tell what kind of deal they are getting.

If, for instance, one immediate annuity that costs $190,000 pays $1,000 a month, while another will pay $1,030 a month, the one with the higher monthly payout is clearly the better deal, everything else being equal (like the stability of the insurer and product features). Still, it’s hard to make a case against more disclosure. And Vanguard says it’s offering customers prices that are usually reserved for institutions with big buying power.

Vanguard, which is working with eight insurers, isn’t the first company to offer this type of online service. Fidelity has been offering annuities from up to six insurers for nearly 15 years. It doesn’t disclose commissions, but says its pricing is competitive with Vanguard’s offerings. Meanwhile, ImmediateAnnuities.com, an online comparison tool and brokerage service run by Hersh Stern since 1983, provides quotes for around 30 insurers. The commissions are not disclosed, though they run about 3 percent on average.

(Vanguard itself offered its own annuity through American General, a unit of the American International Group, for nearly a decade. But now, all annuities will be available through the new platform, including an annuity through American General.)

I decided to test out Vanguard’s new service based on a married couple — he’s 67, she’s 66 — looking to buy an immediate annuity that would generate about $1,000 a month and would pay the surviving spouse the same amount. Their calculator said it would cost about $191,000.

With that information in hand, I filled out a short questionnaire, and within 10 seconds, I received quotes from four insurers, ranging from $941 to $989 a month. (If I wanted my payment to rise by 1 percent each year, that would cost extra and lower the initial monthly payment by roughly $95 a month, across all insurers.)

When I plugged in the same numbers at ImmediateAnnuities.com, the 10 quotes I received ranged from about $898 to $975 a month. Fidelity’s service does not offer real-time quotes online, but instead requires you to call an annuity specialist — a salaried Fidelity employee — who will walk you through the process. Fidelity executives say that’s because they want investors to be sure the annuity makes sense for their financial situation. “This is a very long-term and often irrevocable decision, and there are significant complexities with the product,” said Jeff Cimini, president of the Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Vanguard’s service, which also offers fixed deferred annuities, makes annuity specialists available by phone as well.

It became really clear to me, after looking at the online services, that many investors will require some hand-holding or other assistance — even though much of the explanatory information on the sites is useful. While immediate annuities are arguably one of the simpler annuity products available, they are still incredibly complex and require you to make several decisions: Should you pay extra so that your payout is adjusted for inflation? What kind of survivor benefits do you need? Is it worth it to pay for a “fixed period,” where another beneficiary will receive income for a stated period of time? And how stable is the insurer that’s backing the annuity?

Not all of these questions are easily answered. Vanguard’s service makes it much easier for do-it-yourself investors to comparison-shop, though I didn’t speak with one of its annuity specialists on the phone. In an ideal world, investors would get their annuity prescription from a certified financial planner, and then fill it at a place like Vanguard.

Has anyone purchased an annuity using an online service? What kind of experience did you have? Is anyone else considering it (or perhaps when rates improve)? Share your thoughts in the comment section below.

Annuities are "sold" not bought? Vanguard begs to differ. Wake up. Your clients being told to buy annuities and told that Vanguard's are diffferent. Doesn't appears so. Wade Dokken